41 thoughts on “Fake fucking of Phillip Anadarko at Gay Hoopla (tip @ Genesis157)

  1. These dudes probably can’t cum while getting fucked. I suspect that this is the main reason why fake fucking exists; dudes can’t get hard/cum while they’re actually getting fucked.
    Shame.

  2. I think it’s more of an ego thing. If they’re too gay throughout their career, it makes them feel less “normal” about themselves.
    Most porn stars make their money escorting, and this won’t fly during those encounters, so they obviously can preform without these antics. It just keeps up the charade of being “normal”. In my humble opinion.
    Also, as a straight porn fan, they do this a lot on that side too. One term, for seeing the flaccid cock while fake penetrating is called: Wind sock.

  3. I have not really checked out gay hoopla and knowing they are doing this kind of bullshit I won’t bother visiting the site now. Nothing worse than fakery or looping the same footage to stretch the length of a scene out.

  4. Hope the other blogs pick up on this. Is about time this site was treated like what it is, a big con game.

  5. prob true in most cases but Tanner/Phillip is an experienced bottom who cums at CF during penetration.

  6. Is it just me, or is there a shitstorm brewing among gay porn fans against studios’ fake fucking? I feel a revolt coming.

  7. So far there have only been two. I’m not really surprised tanner’s scene featured fake fucking.

  8. ALL porn movies have fake fucking moments. I don’t understand why you feel so affected by this. This should be referred as a technical mistake and that’s it.
    There are plenty of other things to be worried about like the spreading of STD in porn.

  9. That May or may not be true, but at the very least it is sloppy editing and breaks the illusion. If you can’t get it as close to real, in my opinion, you do not get my money. Otherwise what are the alternatives? Allowing flaccid dicks in more scenes and being more blantant about fake fucking?

  10. You are right TECHNICALLY….however, editing plays an important part in porn production! In order for the “fantasy” to be realized editing out the images that show flacid penises waffting about is paramount. I’m not a porn expert but doggy style fake fucking is probably the most used position but has almost a singular error [capturing the flacid penis between the bottom’s legs]…IT’S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE…so if you have a scene that uses FF doggy style..then edit OUT the images of the top’s limp dick OR make special arrangments not to capture it on film. Use a different angle, secure the top’s penis so it’s not dangling between the bottom’s legs. IT”S a simple fix and a simple error to avoid. What’s the point of watching porn if you can reach for the fantasy!

  11. Gayhoopla is a very disappointing site. As much as I was rooting for them, their youth and experience shows. Like others have stated, the camera work is terrible and has not improved one bit. Solos bore me. Hardcore scenes are too infrequent and the non-stop hyping of scenes that just don’t deliver caused me to cancel my subscription.
    I like La El/Landon as a model, but he not willing to explore his sexuality on screen so I lost interest in him. I like “amateur and vouyer sites, but I doubt that I will going back to GayHoopla. They seem to play to their hardcore base of super fans but have shown little interest in expanding beyond that base. I’m done giving them passes with my hard earned money.

  12. In this Video,,,,Dimitry gets the FOUL-TASTE of Phillip’s ENEMA-secretion upon rimming his butt-hole after the FAKE-FUCKING…and had to substitute tooth-paste since no mouth-wash was available for gargling. “YUCK”!!

  13. Let’s not blame the bottom, Tanner from Corbin Fisher. He’s a very talented performer. This is all Gayhoopla’s fault

  14. Thumbs up on your comment. I wish more people will call bullshit on these type of websites

  15. Does anyone remember Straight College Men? All they ever did was “softcore” fake-fucking, but they didn’t pretend it was anything else…I know that only two sites doing this recently have been caught-out, but I reckon there’s a lot more of it going about. I know that things are controlled in the edit and sometimes a shoot lasts a couple of days and that bloopers and errors supposed have to be edited out, but there’s no excuse for faking what there isn’t to film.

  16. While it’s true that this is poor editing and poor performing, there’s really only one way to stop it, and it isn’t by cancelling subscriptions over specific scenes, etc.
    Ultimately, we have mostly ourselves to blame. The gay porn-viewing community (if that isn’t too redundant) seems to love fetishizing the notion of a straight guy having gay sex. How many “gay” amateur sites have made that their bread & butter. Even the more cornerstone sites that tend to at least mostly get praised have made it their “thing”: Randy Blue, Corbin Fisher, Sean Cody, Broke Straight Boys, College Dudes, Active Duty, etc., etc. And when a straight model has finally given what is asked, it’s just blood in the water. After any given straight model finally crosses the line from solos to topping, the viewers immediately insist if they don’t bottom that they’ll take their toys and patronize elsewhere (which incidentally makes me believe there are vastly more tops commenting on gay porn review blogs than are currently in the dating pool). And when the site finally coughs up enough money and AnalEze to get them to bottom, we get mad when they suck at it.
    While I do think we all lack a good expanded sexual vocabulary for describing guys who exist somewhere between straight and bisexual, I also think expecting truly straight guys to perform well in this industry is sketchy…just as it would be to expect a truly gay guy to perform in straight porn. As long as we collectively patronize sites that idolize the notion of a straight guy doing something on film he’d never do in private, we’ll have to endure a ratio of several bad performers for every one good one. And we’ll have to endure the accompanying parade of sites populated with mostly straight guys who’ve learned they can use their straightness to get money from gay men. And it is likely that those straight performers who can truly perform fall in that nebulous terminology-vacant territory for straight guys who aren’t precisely bisexual, but who do well in gay sex (those 80/20 guys who might be capable of sexual chemistry with a guy, but never emotional/romantic chemistry).
    So long story short…if we all get over that unrequiting straight guy we crushed on or lusted over in our high school gym classes, this business model would begin to devour its own tail and be replaced by real gay/bisexual performers and sites who value them.

  17. Fake fucking has existed in gay/straight porn for years. This is not a new thing in any sense of the imagination. This will continue to go on. This was bad editing period. If you are looking for 100% fucking to happen then you should probably stay in your bedroom having sex because you are not going to find that in the porn industry. Many of these shoots take hours to put together and if the bottom is straight it could take longer. But as history has proven no one person can continually gets fucked for four straight hours and not have some discomfort. That is why fake fucking still exists to this day. It is all about angles and the illusion. This to me is a non story with people trying to act like this company was the first to get caught fake fucking. I dare anyone to find a company that this doesn’t occur at within the porn industry. You are entitled to choose the site you care to be a member at, but just remember what you see is not always what you think you are seeing.

  18. I think you have missed the point. What many of the people here are saying is the “fake fucking” at Gay Hoopla has exposed that GayHoopla is really a weak site. Fake fucking, poor editing, poor camera work, infrequent hardcore scenes, arrogant director/producers, incessant hyping of mediocre content makes for an overall fail. Maybe one of these issues alone can be overlooked, but when you combine them all together, we as consumers and fans will exercise our rights to spend our money elsewhere.
    Sure, we get the niche that GayHoopla is trying to capture…combination voyeur, straight bait, amateur, frat, caught in the act type of scenes but it has just not come together that way. Yes, sites like SCM were/are better and more honest at capturing “straight guy” porn, warts and all, but as someone described, this is Fratpad lite. Fratpad lite gone bad.

  19. It wasn’t after the fake fucking, it was behind the scene footage that they showed that when Dmitry turn him around to rim him that he got a real unpleasant surprise. Tanner aka Philip has worked for a top tier company like CF for over a year and should know how to clean himself. They never should have added that footage. They showed Cole and the Camera guy(JJ Swift?) had a good laugh about it.

  20. They had scenes that showed Hardcore fucking. the Tucker in Payne scenes for instance also the Tucker in everyone else videos had fucking. They also had videos they showed fucking and the bottom could only handle a few minutes of it(Dean for instance)

  21. Last night I took a look at the new Gay Hoopla video with Tanner aka Marcon-Frat Men aka Philip. I skimmed it and at the end the a BTS Blooper footage. In the BTS Dmitry turns Philip akak Tanner around to rim him. He goes to rim him and starts gagging and says he can’t do it and says Philip isn’t CLEAN down there………….WTF? Philip jumps up and heads to the bathroom, while Dmitry is making horrified faces and saying it tasted nasty. Cole money is in the back room and the camera guy goes in and tells him what the fuss is all about. Cole and the camera guy are having a good laugh, while Dmitry tries to find some mouth wash to gurgle with and Cole says that it is probably the foam that happens after an enema and mentions that Philip aka Tanner probably didn’t rinse out with water after the enema. Dmitry finds some toothpaste and squirts it in his mouth and a few seconds realizes that was a bad idea. Philip aka Tanner goes in and out the bathroom and is ready to resume, Dmitry is still having a reaction to things and cannot describe what it was that made Tanner’s hole taste the way and the toothpaste was not a good idea.
    Now, what I would like to know is WHO THE HELL IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD SHOW THE BTS FOOTAGE? That is just gross and the members never needed to see that. Now, I cannot bring myself to watch the video. Tanner aka Philip has worked with Cf for a good period of time and should know everything there is to know about enemas and how to do it correctly. If Dawson or Connor find out about this they would be floored. They know they taught Tanner aka Philip better then that.
    I compared this new site to AustinZane(Really just an over all comparative) but AustinZane was a lot more professional and would never air something like that. It was just plain Messy on the part of the 2 young owners of Gay Hoopla. #CannotUnSee

  22. EXACTLY…WHY in the world would they choose to show THAT for BTS footage. It’s illogical. The apparent arrogance of these men is stargint to corrode their business. They believe that as long as they get naked, reach orgasm and kiss another dude, it’s oscar worthy. That footage bascially demolishes what little redeeming value the fake fucking didn’t. It’s illogical to show that footage unless you think it’s funny and by all means is NOT![unless you are a junior high reject]. Another rationale for a studio to show that footage would entail a level of self absorbed arrogance that cannot be articulated. I think they are quickly forgetting that the most important part of any business is the consumer…not their self idolized semi hard bonners. Just because a studio shows a hard penis does not make a studio a successful business! I cannot state enough how dissappointed I am in Gayhooplas antics lately!

  23. However in SCM it WAS funny bc as you stated they didn’t try to disguise any other way. Aslo it’s probably one reason why it didn’t succeed. At the hieght of SCM’s popularity a slew of other sites started that showed actual hard core content without the juvenille content [SC, CF, CB etc etc. So members quickly stopped paying for the immature version of their fantasies lol

  24. Great commentary and thanks for everyone’s opinion. I have been wondering whether to sporting for a membership or not. I have opted not to do this. I hope the Gayhoop,a guys are reading this.. But for some reason I suspect they do not give a shit about this blog or anyone’s constructive opinion.

  25. To say that one scene from gayhoopla.com makes it a weak site is in reality a weak argument. As for the rest of your opinion I would agree with some of it, but the few times I have been there they seem to be doing just fine in the attraction department. Good looking guys on cam for free will attract people no matter what. The comparison you make to gayhoopla.com being fratpad lite doesn’t make sense. They have one hour shows as several other live cam sites have as well. Do you consider those sites fratpad lite as well? BTW some of those sites have been around way longer than the pad has by far and they still get good numbers to this day.
    The Fratpad is currently shut down because of a drug issue and the firing of four models all at once. I have to say that one point that seems to be missing here is people like talking to others and if that other person is willing to jack off on cam while talking to members of a site then so be it. If that is not your cup of tea then move on.
    In regards to your arrogant comment about the owner, well just making that comment proves you don’t know much about him.
    Your overall fail comment about the site is your opinion but you are one of the few because if you check around they are getting noticed for good reasons and not for one scene that showed fake fucking. All that scene did was prove that they are no different than any other site doing porn.
    In the end it is all about what you like and don’t like. That might explain why new porn sites are popping up every day. Some make it and some don’t. Gayhoopla.com has done nothing but grow since they started around a year ago. Many sites can’t say that who started at the same time they did.

  26. YES!!!!! My “wordiness” has SPREAD LIKE A VIRUS!!!!!
    Love the comments everyone! Keep it up!

  27. I disagree this is a nonstory. Yes, fake fucking has been around forever (and better editing helps with the illusion), but if GayHoopla wants to be the next big thing in porn, how about doing a better production and not resorting to multi-hour shoots that require fake fucking? Or better yet, get models that can actually fuck other guys? If they stuck to what they do best – the one hour jack off shows – it would be a decent site. But the hardcore shows are awful because they’re using guys who shouldn’t be doing hardcore.

  28. You’re correct about that. There is a blog that overrates everything they do and makes it seem like the shows are the greatest thing ever.

  29. Fake or not, Gayhoopla is such a BORING site, god. How did they go from the (rather good) fratpad to this lowly shit?
    And mostly I am disappointed from Dmitry Dikov – he was so sexy on fratpad!! now he is no more but a sad shadow of himself, looks like a looser down on his luck, despereate for cash.. really sad!

  30. David that is your opinion but we can only state that they have one film that shows fake fucking. I will concede your point about getting guys that can fuck and keep it up. But again that is a problem on many sites and not just gayhoopla.com. And yes you are right if they want to be the next big thing then they have to step up their game. To say that they are using guys that shouldn’t be doing hard core. Well does that statement include Logan Vaughn, Austin Wilde, Cameron Foster, Cody Wolfe(aka Bryan Cavalla of CF/College dudes, and finally FM Marco/Tanner of CF. All of those guys have done hard core at different sites so they must be doing something that catches the eye of other porn sites for them to fuck on?
    There were others that appeared on gayhoopla.com that didn’t do hardcore but have done it at many other sites. Those guys are Rob Ryder, Eric Blazer, Drew Michael, Bobby Rivera, and Ray Han.
    This site is almost a year old. It should come as no surprise that this amateur site has amateur’s in front of the cam and behind the cam as well. Now if after their second year if they are still having the editing issues then the criticism is warranted big time. But for now they are learning and growing at the same time so they are going to make mistakes, but any mistakes made should be one off here and there. If it becomes the standard then most of everything that has been stated in this post is 100% warranted.
    If those that are stating they don’t like it now well that is also their opinion and they can choose to spend their money elsewhere. But considering who is in charge of that site I don’t see things getting worse. Landon doesn’t work that way. He will take what has been posted here as motivation to prove those that can’t stand what he is doing with the site right now and do his very best to prove them wrong.
    If he does’t change some minds well those are people that never will change because they have made up their mind and will never change it. Those are not the people Landon is trying to target anyway. So it is probably best that those that don’t like what he is doing now and never will to just move on to a site that provides them what they are looking for.

  31. I wouldn’t say Randy Blue so much though.
    But yes, you are right! There are people who fall between the straight and bisexual category. I know it may sound absurd, but they don’t really call themselves bisexual because they are not quite that, like Rocco Reed. He said he was somewhere in the middle and that he’s NOT into guy romantically. He has also never been in a relationship with a guy and now he’s engaged to woman.
    I think the sites that are solely/largely populated by such guys are Bel Ami, Fratpad, Corbin Fisher and of course, Gay Hoopla. I am not so sure about other sites you mentioned because I notice that many of these sites who claim that their guys are straight often have those fake straight-acting gays.

  32. This whole posting, including most of the comments, seem to be made by people trying to shoot down a struggling new site doing its best to please its audience. La El & Dmitry are NOT arrogant, listen to everyone’s critiques & reply to them with courtesy AND take action on them. I’m sure they thought people would be amused by that rimming episode, which is why they included it. As far as the “fake fucking” goes, I hate it when people LOOK for it. It happens all the time because the vids are put together from many shoots. You guys ruined what was a great, hot video. I didn’t see a dangling penis because I wasn’t looking for it. How about encouraging a fledgling new site instead of assassinating it. And all of these negative reviews about GayHoopla makes it look like everyone hates it, whereas its membership is growing by leaps and bounds. We’re glad all the people that had all those negative things to say are not a part of the membership. The members that have stayed are a better sort of people. Viva GayHoopla!

  33. If you check out “Darren fucks Tanner” at CF, you’ll see a fake penetration shot there as Tanner cums.
    All studios do this. I’m always skeptical when there’s a lot of “deep” fucking with no camera movement to see penetration from a different angle.
    This is why I like SC the best. They do long takes on the cameras. Start with a penetration visual and then swing the camera round so you can see models. Not always, but more often than any other site.
    CF is the worst when it comes to editing. Too many quick shots which could just be one 3 minute stretch on repeat, sliced up so you can’t tell. And then their cumshots are too frequently terrible.
    “I’m about to cum, I’m going to bust–”
    CUT to next shot which is clearly not as intense or fast paced, and the dude cums, sure with a dick in his ass but no fucking involved. I always lose it after those.
    I would prefer a side-by-side shoot for cum shots and if the model can’t take bottoming then A, don’t have him bottom (or at least put in description- ChaosMen is the best for this; Bryan is always very honest about how the shoot turns out, unlike CF where it’s always “Model X stays hard the whole time and clearly loves getting pounded by Model Y – they have great chemistry!” And then you watch the video and it’s slow, and uneventful; a snooze-fest) or B) show him bottoming for only a few minutes if that’s all he can take because you can turn it into a shorter oral/JO video. Some guys actually really like that and a little bit of fucking throws in a little extra.
    I’m not a massive GH fan. I think the quality isn’t great, but then again it’s a new site and it is mostly a live-cam thing, which they tell you. I’m not convinced of the fucking but the models are more interactive with the audience so you have to take the good with the bad.

Comments are closed.